Skip to content
MapleUpdate

The Worst Video Games of 2025, Based on Review Aggregator Metacritic

At every turn, fans are eagerly sharing their rankings of the best releases of 2025. However, what of the flops, the low achievers? Let's take a momentary detour to recognize the absolute worst games of the year, based on review aggregator Metacritic. Is every one of these games as bad as their scores suggest? Here is the list.

10. Welcome Tour for Switch 2

Aggregate Score: 54/100, Audience Score: 3.4/10

Initial reactions to this pack-in experience were shaped by its $9.99 price tag, with many expressing disappointment it wasn't a complimentary title like similar console launches. Reviewer sentiment spanned a wide spectrum, from scathing critiques to more generous takes that highlighted the charming software underneath the controversy. Despite the grumbling, the title proved to be a strong digital seller during its launch month.

9. Rennsport

Metascore: 53/100, User Score: 3.2/10

Billed as "beyond a racing game," this driving sim from Competition Company and Teyon was met with pretty unanimous reviews. Critics noted that the game was lacking in key areas, especially in a year featuring high-quality racing experiences. Ultimately, this sputtering stinker was best left on the shelf.

8. Bubsy's Purrfect Collection

Aggregate Score: 53/100, Audience Score: 8.6/10

To begin with: the irritating punctuation is a silly point of contention. This compilation of 1990s-era Bubsy titles revives a "attitude"-filled feline known for incessant hacky one-liners. Reviewers noted that these games haven't aged well originally and haven't gotten better with age. The improbably high user score stands as a curious anomaly to the professional reviews.

7. Hunter x Hunter: Nen x Impact

Metascore: 53, Audience Score: 3.5

This *Hunter x Hunter* brawler encountered significant backlash from both professionals and the dedicated community. Issues included a thin roster of characters and a severe lack of features. Player sentiment was especially harsh, with some expressing a wish that the title's flop would serve as a lesson for similar releases.

6. Riders Vs Dogoos

Aggregate Score: 51, User Score: 5.3

A part of the niche Hyperdimension Neptunia series, this motorcycle action game tasks players with rounding up cute monsters. The assessment was that its effort to mimic a *Katamari Damacy*-like gameplay loop ultimately fell flat, coming across as more of a low-effort product than a worthy series entry. Its brief runtime combined with a $40 price tag raised eyebrows.

5. Captain Blood

Metascore: 50, Audience Score: 5.3

This title is a resurrected relic from the Xbox era, finally released after a very long time in production delays. The team behind it opted to keep the game as an authentic artifact of its time, accepting that today's audiences might criticize its old-school mechanics. As such, many reviews noted that the interesting history of its journey was far richer than the actual gameplay.

4. Scar-Lead Salvation

Aggregate Score: 44, User Score: 2.4

This anime-art third-person shooter modeled after games like *Returnal* disappointed with critics. The main issues included bland enemy design, samey environments, and a unengaging plot. A controversial mechanic involving the character's attire was seen as adding nothing and took away from the game's overall experience.

3. Paramedic Simulator

Aggregate Score: 44, Audience Score: 4.9

Imagine the strategic surgery games of the past, then remove the satisfying gameplay. That, according to reviews, is roughly *Ambulance Life*. Players found the ambulance-driving sequences to be a slog, and the narrative's handling of its subject matter was criticized as being insensitive. The overall experience was deemed a missed opportunity.

2. Tamagotchi Plaza

Aggregate Score: 43, Audience Score: 5.8

This shift away from the classic virtual pet formula makes the franchise into a town-management title. The result, according to critics, was a unsatisfying collection of simple minigames that rapidly became boring. Some reviews went so far as to label it one of the worst titles available on its platform, citing a profound lack of engaging content.

1. MindsEye

Metascore: 37, User Score: 2.5

Arriving as a high-profile open-world action game from a studio led by well-known figures, *MindsEye* was a notable disappointment. Reviews heavily criticized its lousy combat, uninspired storytelling, and a plethora of game-breaking glitches. Several found it to be a significant step back compared to previous-generation games in the action genre. Despite the sea of negativity, a small handful of optimistic players found value in the experience, serving as a lonely counterpoint.

About the author

Kelly Wise

A passionate gamer and tech writer with over 8 years of experience covering industry trends and game analysis.

MapleUpdate

Type to search articles.